Talk:Pultenaea blakelyi

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: New South Wales / Victoria / Biota Low‑importance

	Australia portal Pultenaea blakelyi is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New South Wales (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Victoria (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of New South Wales, or the State Library of Victoria.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Typo needing fixing edit

Latest comment: 8 months ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Surely "3.5 mm (0.14 in)" is wrong for the height of this shrub! :-) I'm assuming it means metres, but Fairley & Moore, Native Plants of the Sydney Region, give 2.5m for the height, so I'm just leaving it with a query. BAPhilp (talk) 03:08, 17 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Changed it from 3.5m to Fairley & Moore's figure of 2.5m, with ref. to their book. (2.5m is my own observation too, FWIW) BAPhilp (talk) 22:58, 11 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

@BAPhilp: Thanks for that. There are different heights quoted. Fairley and Moore give 2.5m, Messina and Stajsic (RBGV) give 3.5m and Les Robinson gives 1–4m. I hope you're okay with the compromise. Gderrin (talk) 23:52, 11 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Looks good to me - how good is Wikipedia! BAPhilp (talk) 06:25, 23 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic