Talk:Provoked (film)

Confusing run-on sentence

Towards the end of the "reception" section is the following sentence: "In the film Kiranjit Ahluwalia is portrayed as a middle class homemaker instead of a factory worker as she was in reality, Pragna Patel and Rahila Gupta's characters are merged to create one person, played by the Indian actress Nandita Das, and Americanized legal terminology rather than the actual British."

This could probably be more coherent by breaking it up into several sentences, particularly the part about American legal terminology which is a completely different subject and isn't explained or elaborated. Promontoriumispromontorium (talk) 10:28, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Title

The IMDb page gives the title Provoked: A True Story; is that a change, or an error somewhere? (It is probably notable enuf to displace the slasher film Provoked (1989) from this title.)
--Jerzy•t 16:17, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Even u r Miles apart from me , My love never Departs

                                  -jay raj

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 19:16, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

kshbfkbwegtewhhgnljhnrlijhkfuhknherhgkljsygiwehgoewrhgoirgkwrnlIHWDKHFIWDNFKJYWERIUFGHGODGKJSDFYHIGUHREGRGKHRGHAKLFJKSABFUGEG87GHNHGUYGVVNGDFGFIDHJGHJBJHgMVBJVBU,NHHJLKH —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.16.249.72 (talk) 22:05, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Murder condoned?

Has no critic ever asked these questions: Why isn't this woman in jail for life??? Why does this movie depict the brutal, pre-planned murder of a human being as something admirable? Because I can't find it in the article anywhere. So much for balance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.128.94.185 (talk) 02:26, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Provoked (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140811061802/http://www.apunkachoice.com/scoop/bollywood/20070420-0.html to http://www.apunkachoice.com/scoop/bollywood/20070420-0.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150112070703/http://www.hindustantimes.com/News-Feed/Entertainment/Aishwarya-s-Provoked-well-received-in-UK to http://www.hindustantimes.com/News-Feed/Entertainment/Aishwarya-s-Provoked-well-received-in-UK
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090828094908/http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.ListAll to http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.ListAll&friendID=33824405

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:23, 3 December 2017 (UTC)