Talk:Project H.A.M.M.E.R.

Project Hammer

First thing I thought of when I saw images of the game were the DC Comics character Steel who weilds a large hammer. Interestingly enough is that in the Steel story line, there is also a character named Natasha - a character name that also appears in Project H.A.M.M.E.R. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.127.218.49 (talk • contribs).

Release Date

The June 2007 release date needs referencing or changing to 2007. If anyone knows of any reliable sources that still say this game is being released in June 2007, please let it be known. Thanks, Cipher ^{(Talk to the hand)} 13:32, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

There has been no confirmed dates more specifically in 2007 (and we're almost half way through), so until we have something specific i have changed it to TBA Fusionblue 10:31, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Rumors

With all the rumors of its cancellation, i think it would be appropriate if this article had a reception section showing the reaction torwards the game in its e3 form so people would know if they may or may not be losing a good game.--Widkid85 03:01, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

I disagree. Very few people were able to play, and not much info was released about the game (only a few screenshots, pretty much). The game was never masde popular enough for their to be a major reaction. Miles Blues 04:43, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

If it does end up getting cancelled, though, I think that would be a good section to have. Miles Blues 22:04, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

if/when it is cancelled why even keep the page? Seems like a waste of wiki resources maintaining a game page that never existed for consumers...ie..what is its worth in an encyclopedia? None. 74.105.214.111 01:31, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not made of paper, that is, we should not worry about "resources". -- ReyBrujo 03:37, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

I removed the huge quote about it, since it really only needs a mention, not the whole IGN article. Miles Blues 02:01, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Seems like it finally got trashed. Just ignore the fact CVG can't distinguish between NST and Monolith Soft http://computerandvideogames.com/article.php?id=168279 Tadashi Ooshima 23:39, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

I think it's safe to say...

It's dead. http://www.infendo.com/wii/project-hammer-is-dead/ 86.157.71.110 19:15, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

Not Cancelled

http://www.gamestop.com/product.asp?product%5Fid=T000515

Nuff' Said —Preceding unsigned comment added by Guitarherorocksthe80s (talk • contribs) 01:58, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

http://www.cubed3.com/news/10041 - Not sure whether it is or not. Geoff B (talk) 10:47, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Projecthammer.jpg

Image:Projecthammer.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:52, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Page has been vandalized

I'm reading this page for the first time and I've noticed that someone has replaced some terms with "Nintendo switch". If anyone could restore this page to what it was before that'd be greatly appreciated. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:100A:B024:ECA8:3130:9A27:1B4F:272E (talk) 17:11, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Vandalism reverted. Thanks for the heads up. Reach Out to the Truth 21:49, 2 February 2017 (UTC)