Talk:Production part approval process
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Questions
editPenalties
editWhat penalties could be imposed to vendors for not doing a PPAP on a part for changing to a regrind or outsourcing component parts?Tj63069 17:41, 29 May 2007 (UTC)Tj63069
I'd say most would only find out if a process had changed if they were investigating a warranty issue, so penaltie could include passing on all the warranty costs and possible desourcing —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.122.161.179 (talk) 14:12, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
Q+A
editIs this a place for Q+A? The penalties could vary depending on market segment, customer's QA attitude, etc.
Version 4 March 1st 2006
editHello, the text says Version 4 March 1st 2006 but not of which standard! Can somebody clarify this? --Master on EN (talk) 08:36, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
Production part approval process (PPAPU)
editHow can PPAPU stand for "production part approval process"? What does U stand for? Aidanr444 (talk) 08:44, 23 August 2016 (UTC)