Talk:Proceeds of Crime Act 2002

Latest comment: 12 years ago by 82.131.210.163 in topic Prominent controversy section needed!

Untitled edit

Removed cleanup tag and upgraded to "C" DavidwinchUK (talk) 21:46, 29 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Added significant new content DavidwinchUK (talk) 19:23, 29 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Terrible article, too many red links, jibberish, etc.213.218.226.92 09:44, 6 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

The red links (jibberish) are all acts of Parliament dealing with confiscation of the proceeds of crime. The powers of the state became more draconian with the implementation of each act. Ron Barker 15:59, 7 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Does "£750,0000" really mean "£750,000" or "£7,500,000"? 86.155.175.70 (talk) 15:16, 15 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

It means £750,000 See: Operation Julie Ron Barker (talk) 13:04, 3 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Prominent controversy section needed! edit

This act is highly controversial. It was used by the MET police for a massive 6.700 deposit-box wrenching "fishing expedition" in 2009, under the disguise of ripping serious criminals of ther stashed profits and drugs. However, bobbies confiscated the "emergency money" of so many jewish people and institutions, that Israel threatened to hurt Britain via the US Capitol Hill, unless the juggernaut stops. A huge number of indian businessman immigrants also lost their cash savings and were told to sue it back, provided they'd been willing to invest 50k UKP up-front for court legal fees (because POCA puts the burden of proof on the citizen, not the gov't). After that infamous raid, circa 17bn UKP swiftly left Blighty for the swiss Alps. 82.131.210.163 (talk) 15:42, 29 December 2011 (UTC)Reply