| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Principes article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | Principes has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
| Current status: Good article | |||||||||||||
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GA Review edit
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Principes/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Looks great. I've read through it a few times and fixed 2 minor link errors. The sourcing is good, too and the only concerns I have are the ones that hit me in these reviews as well:
- Caps...sometimes Principes is capitalized, sometimes not. Make it consistent.
Done
- Italics, I think it would be best to italicize the Latin words, throughout.
- Done
Again, great job...fix these and I'll have another look later on.--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 20:18, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
- On the suggestion of someoen else I have restructured the article, is the new structure fine with you?--Serviam (talk) 18:21, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
I'm passing it, reorg is even better than before!--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 03:11, 15 September 2008 (UTC)