Talk:Prince Pedro, Duke of Calabria
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Before reverting my good faith edit, please explain why he should not be referred to as Duke of Calabria, since he claimed the title on his fathers death. If his father could be referred to as Duke of Calabria, disputed though it was, so can prince Pedro. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.89.33.32 (talk) 18:11, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
Italian Titles edit
A certain editor is erroneously claiming that Prince Pedro's titles are French. These titles are not French and the links provided to not show them to be French. Therefore, I will be removing such unsubstantiated claims until such time as someone can substantiate them. CSBurksesq (talk) 01:06, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
Comment Request from other editors (RfC) edit
Greetings:
There is a dispute between myself and a fellow editor (Javierdpeñad). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Javierdpe%C3%B1ad
The debate is over whether or not Prince Pedro is a "French prince."
It is my contention that the sources* provided by the aforementioned editor violate NPOV (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view) and verifiability (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability).
This is the third time I have undone/removed the editor's unsubstantiated edits. CSBurksesq (talk) 19:00, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
- I have also just reverted that claim, which to the best of my knowledge is not true. Hopefully the user can explain the purpose of their edits here. pinging Javierdpeñad Jacoby531 (talk) 18:38, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
Edit/note: I meant to say claims, not "sources." CSBurksesq (talk) 20:28, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:23, 12 July 2021 (UTC)