This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
It's not likely, despite the quoted source, that the Army was looking, in the 1980s, for an alternative to feathers, but rather to other synthetic fibers, which somehow were not adequate. Would be much more interesting to say why the artificial fibers were inadequate.24.6.66.149 (talk) 12:10, 19 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
.jpg){kind=small}