This article is part of WikiProject Jainism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Jainism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Latest comment: 2 days ago2 comments1 person in discussion
@Sanmarg Jain: The content you keep adding[1][2][3] is unsuitable for an encyclopaedia - it reads like a hagiography, full of WP:PEACOCK terms ("most revered Jain ascetic", "displayed sharp intellect", "His life epitomizes unwavering devotion to Jainism and indefatigable pursuit of scholastic excellence", "his deep knowledge", "His contributions to Sanskrit literature and the elucidation of the karma doctrine continue to inspire adherents and scholars alike" etc. etc.), editorialising ("But this life was not destined for him", etc.) and trivia of no encyclopaedic value ("Premsurisvarji's life was dedicated to the service of Jainism", "Premchand was the name given to the new born child", "In those days Sanskrit scholars were scarcely found in Gujarat", "It is worthy of mention that Acarya Premsurisvarji Maharaj always used to go through the press copies of this great research work personally and revise them even at an advanced age of eightyfive", etc. etc.).
For this reason, I've reverted your entire additions, then added some of that information, condensed and in an encyclopaedic tone, back to the article. Still, as all of this is entirely unsourced while Wikipedia has stringent sourcing requirements, I strongly recommend you don't reinsert your unsourced hagiography and instead focus on fidning good sources for all the facts that are already mentioned in the article. Cheers, — kashmīrīTALK 13:00, 7 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
