This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.Alternative ViewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative ViewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative ViewsAlternative Views articles
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Quoting Ramana Maharshi does NOT qualify as evidence. So for example regarding types of prarabdha karma you should quote from upanishads, puranas or similar literature. That is adequate pramana, evidence of epistemic value. But quoting Ramana Maharshi doesn't have epistemic value. So please provide paramana from sruti or smriti texts. Otherwise remove questionable sources. 24.139.24.163 (talk) 17:57, 7 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
