Talk:Power-system automation
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | The contents of the C37.94 page were merged into Power-system automation. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. (11 August 2017) |
Wikified edit
Wikified as part of the wikification drive. KarenAnn 17:58, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Needs work edit
Wow, all I can say is this article needs a lot of work. It is very poorly written; it is confusing and poorly organized, and is way too informal in tone. It also needs a lot of expansion. It needs a decent introduction too - the introductory sentence is horrible. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.228.245.174 (talk) 03:04, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
Telemeter edit
This page redirects for Telemeter... though is not really relevant to Telemeters, Telemetery or other sundy uses of that word. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.42.80.225 (talk) 21:55, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
- Offhand I can think of one application for Telemeter (an obsolete and non-notable pay television box) and based on the "what links here" for this page, which lists out what comes here via the Telemeter redirect, there are other applications. One refers to "telemetering seismometers" (which really should link out to telemetering, but that's another redirect here) and the other is Telemeter Glacier, where telemeter seems to be (in context) something like a surveyor's transit or theodolite. I agree that the redirects are inappropriate and I'll go break them. For what it's worth, we have an article for telemetry already which may be what you're looking for. Morrand (talk) 02:50, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
Suggest merge edit
Individual IEEE technical standards are generally not "notable" in the Wikipedia sense. The article at C37.94 presently rehashes a lot of things related to power system automation and specific mention of the topic standard is minimal. Suggest a merge and redirect, collecting whatever text seems generally applicable from C37.94 where it's an improvement to this article. --Wtshymanski (talk) 15:13, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
