Talk:Postmodern social construction of nature
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 17 September 2007. The result of the discussion was No consensus.. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Query edit
in the last sentence under Criticism, there's ref to the Wapner Paradox. Afaik there is no WP, but there is the Banach–Tarski paradox (or the Euclidian one?) and Leonard M. Wapner is a math guy who wrote a short work about it called The Pea and the Sun. Can someone clarify please? 110.32.248.83 (talk) 04:25, 28 May 2011 (UTC) Manytexts (sorry can't get my password atm)
No idea. The article looks like a spoof. Candidate for deletion? Theeurocrat (talk) 18:26, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
Description as "theorem" edit
Is the word "theorem" used with a different meaning than the usual mathematical one in contexts like this? This doesn't look anything like a theorem, but I don't really understand what the article is trying to say enough to re-phrase it sensibly. 188.164.31.97 (talk) 19:19, 1 July 2017 (UTC)