Talk:Posterior perforated substance

Could 'page does not exist' (red link) for interpeduncular ganglion be accurately linked to extant Interpeduncular_nucleus ?

In the lead I see, "...contains a nucleus named the interpeduncular ganglion;...", for which page does not exist is indicated for said 'interpeduncular ganglion'. It looks to me as if that link could be made to be to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interpeduncular_nucleus and/or the wording changed directly to interpeduncular nucleus, though I don't know for sure. I do know that 'ganglion' is itself technically incorrect, since the item is in the central, not peripheral, nervous system, but that in at least one instance (basal ganglia) the term is used in a 'grand-fathered' sense. I don't think 'grand-fathering' is generally the case for this particular item, but I'm not sure. If there's no objections, at some point I'll be bold and make one or both those changes.UnderEducatedGeezer (talk) 01:28, 20 September 2018 (UTC)