Talk:PostScript fonts

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

Typography Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Typography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Typography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TypographyWikipedia:WikiProject TypographyTemplate:WikiProject TypographyTypography articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

conflicting senses edit

Latest comment: 9 months ago3 comments2 people in discussion

In addition to font types, PostScript specifications also defined the Core Font Set, which dictates the minimum number of fonts and character sets to be supported by each font.

Fonts to be supported by each font? Is the specification recursive? —Tamfang (talk) 18:29, 13 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

I've added a comma for clarification.--Oneiros (talk) 21:04, 13 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Belated thanks. —Tamfang (talk) 23:23, 1 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

precise font names edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The precise font names are: "AvantGarde-Book", "AvantGarde-BookOblique", [etc etc]

The edit summary says these are "Needed". Why? —Tamfang (talk) 06:47, 27 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

I removed those, the exact names are only needed if you're directly working on an implementation; in that case you better just get the original specs --DieBuche (talk) 10:07, 14 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Add topic