Talk:Porter-class destroyer
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Trekphiler in topic Floyd R. Turbo, destroyer
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Porter-class destroyer article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
Bit of a nit, but ... edit
This is not worth getting into an edit war over, and maybe not worth spending much time discussing; but: "an 1,850-ton destroyer" versus "a 1,850-ton destroyer"? When I read it aloud, I read it as "an eighteen hundred fifty ton destroyer", or even "an eighteen fifty ton destroyer" not "a one thousand eight hundred fifty ton" destroyer. The phrase is intrinsically awkward and unfortunate, but it's nonetheless such common usage that I'm afraid the question is not easily avoided.
Googling doesn't help much. Both forms are widely used. --Yaush (talk) 20:46, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
Floyd R. Turbo, destroyer edit
So who manufactured the turbines for the ships not built by NYSB? TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura 09:00, 4 March 2019 (UTC)