Talk:Polytomy

	Evolutionary biology portal This article is part of WikiProject Evolutionary biology, an attempt at building a useful set of articles on evolutionary biology and its associated subfields such as population genetics, quantitative genetics, molecular evolution, phylogenetics, and evolutionary developmental biology. It is distinct from the WikiProject Tree of Life in that it attempts to cover patterns, process and theory rather than systematics and taxonomy. If you would like to participate, there are some suggestions on this page (see also Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ for more information) or visit WikiProject Evolutionary biologyEvolutionary biologyWikipedia:WikiProject Evolutionary biologyTemplate:WikiProject Evolutionary biologyEvolutionary biology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Molecular Biology: COMPBIO

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Computational Biology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Also needs some sort of illustration. Richard001 (talk) 23:28, 6 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Introduction is confusing edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The introduction is confusing. The picture is actually much simpler and easier to understand.

The start of the article should be rewritten. Visitors should instantly see what a polytomy is, and the "explanation" with words is ... just confusing right now. 2A02:8388:1641:8380:15C2:A3F1:9A28:71D9 (talk) 21:52, 13 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

I agree. I've attempted to re-write it to make it clearer. Comments welcome. Peter coxhead (talk) 09:25, 14 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Add topic