Talk:Politics of Belarus

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 65.88.88.137 in topic Important notice

Old talk

edit

The "Political parties" paragraph should be placed first, as many acronyms are referred to in the main part of the article. Simply stating the name of the acronym would not be sufficient, as giving the name of a party is not enough to explain who they are. It might be enough to only put the PCB and BPF parts in fromt and the rest at the end.

NPOV

edit

I think Lukashenko is a very evil man, but surely it would be better if we didn't say that "the Lukashenko regime has launched a campaign against Polish ethnic minority" - as they, of course, assert that Poland and other countries are attempting to spy on them, and claim that their activities aren't against ethnic Poles, but only against the organisation which represents them. We need to put their side of the story to make the article more effective. XYaAsehShalomX 14:18, 15 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

The above user is absolutely right. Particularly when it ought to be remembered that the 'Polish dispute' was not engineered by Lukashenko, but came from a complaint from the Belarusian Union of Poles to the Ministry of Justice that some of their own members had violated the organisation's constitution. I can explain further if neccesary, but urge that NPOV be followed.--Belaruski 19:58, 22 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

The problem we have here is much of our article was a copy and paste from public domain resources owned by the United States Government and my government has been pretty harsh on President Lukashenko. I would like to clean this up but I just don't know how just quite yet. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 20:03, 22 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

"Government of Belarus"

edit

Surely this needs a separate article - ie, the structure of the government, how it's set up, etc? It's OK as a politics article, but when I linked from this article it just comes up with this. Someone who's more knowledgeable about it than me needs to make something seperate :) XYaAsehShalomX 14:18, 15 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

"Presidential republic"

edit

After recent events I'm not sure if this is entirely correct anymore. Maybe "presidential dictatorship" would be closer to the truth. Maybe after the "elections" the word "republic" in the article could be changed... Or? --HJV 22:20, 15 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

While it is not a presidental republic by spirit or by Luka's actions, technically, Belarus is a "republic" that is headed by a president. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) Fair use policy 00:20, 16 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

2006 elections

edit

Aren't we missing section on them? See Alexander_Lukashenko#2006_presidential_election as well as some stories: Wikinews, MYT, Times, Reuters, Guardian, ABC, just to name a few.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 23:23, 20 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

We are going to add it soon. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 01:03, 21 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Overall state of page

edit

I removed a cleanup tag that had been hanging around since 2005, not motivated on talk. I admit I have not read the page in detail, but it does not look like a typical cleanup candidate to me; formats look fine. The sections are very long, maybe they can be condensed? // habj 16:36, 28 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, i'll peer through it later. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 18:31, 28 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Important notice

edit

The government section of the "Outline of Belarus" needs to be checked, corrected, and completed -- especially the subsections for the government branches.

When the country outlines were created, temporary data (that matched most of the countries but not all) was used to speed up the process. Those countries for which the temporary data does not match must be replaced with the correct information.

Please check that this country's outline is not in error.

If you have any questions or comments, please contact The Transhumanist .

Thank you.

Most of this article has been plagiarized word for word from the book Belarus and Moldova : country studies by Helen Fedor, yet this resource is not quoted or cited. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.88.88.137 (talk) 17:07, 30 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

update on opposition parties

edit

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-13969346

just going to leave this here Ugottoknowme2 (talk) 08:19, 30 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Politics of Belarus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:46, 6 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:55, 24 July 2021 (UTC)Reply