Talk:Political libel

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified


Untitled edit

Are the Canadian cases political libel or just libel? Is Canadian libel law really more pro plaintiff than the libel law of England and Wales? The Canadian stuff looks like it needs an expert eye. Secretlondon 15:13, 31 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Added "bias" template for just this reason. Revived 22:03, 14 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
Do Prime Ministers sue the Official Opposition in any other country using common law? No. The Harper case ought to settle the issue. The premise of the article that this an archaic curiosity that happens only in Canada seems to have been well validated by recent events. There are also a few other minor cases involving Gerard Kennedy and the National Post, many petty politicians suing each other in New Brunswick, and even the Premier of Saskatchewan, Brad Wall, filing such a suit that he quickly withdrew. It's difficult or impossible to represent the motives of any of these suits as other than political positioning. Certainly no provable damages are involved.
Read the references - the Canadian laws provide for only a very narrow exemption for comment within the legislature. Even when those exact comments are cited in a press release or press report, they are not priveleged, no matter how important the public issue nor how prominent the advocate nor how widespread the opinion. This is so much narrower an exemption than in any other common law country that it allows for libel suits to be used to political ends. If there are even one half as many such cases per capita in any other common law country then it might be possible to argue that there is no qualitative difference in the libel laws. However given the situation as it stands, the Harper case seems to settle the issue of whether or not there is any strange unique aspect to Canadian libel law. So the bias check tag will come off if there is no objection? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.177.78.212 (talk) 22:52, 6 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Political libel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:21, 1 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Political libel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:35, 2 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Political libel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:58, 21 September 2017 (UTC)Reply