This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
203.198.237.30 made the edit comment "until you give us a credible ref, out with your overt Louis Armstrong Swiss Kriss swilling agenda, mr cuisse de grenouille! 20c over 1900s??". The wording sounds rather amusing, but I fear I don't know what you're asking (or what point you're trying to make) with the question "20c over 1900s??". Wondering simply, -- Regular Infrogmation 08:20, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)
A friendly suggestion, rather than a demand! On the matter of the actual wording, the current version now puts it better. And the last superfluous bit was about the use of early "20th century" over "1900s" (revert accepted) — 18 Mar 2005.
Okay. Note 20th century discusseses a century, while 1900s discusses a decade. Cheers, -- Infrogmation 14:11, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)
A little thing like what kind of ingredient may be of help... <eg>