Talk:Pleasley Colliery

Derbyshire Mid‑importance

The article on Pleasley Colliery is supported by the Derbyshire WikiProject, which is a collaborative effort to improve the quality and coverage of Derbyshire-related articles on Wikipedia.DerbyshireWikipedia:WikiProject DerbyshireTemplate:WikiProject DerbyshireDerbyshire articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

More information:
/
	At least one photograph is included in this article

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mining Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mining, a collaborative project to organize and improve articles related to mining and mineral industries. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, or visit the project page, where you can see a list of open tasks, join in the discussion, or join the project.MiningWikipedia:WikiProject MiningTemplate:WikiProject MiningMining articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Scheduled Ancient Monument

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Can we get a source for verification of this claim? /Blaxthos ( t / c ) 23:33, 24 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

English Heritage: National Monuments Record number = SK 46 SE 31 / Stefanthatch (talk) 19:01, 31 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Brilliant article

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

mice structure, tone and pic.With an ibox and inline refs this could be a "Good Article" Well done Victuallers (talk) 07:55, 24 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image changes & additional section

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The new image added at the introduction to the article does give a better visual perspective, but the image of the South headstock is not in an appropriate location since it is not relevant to the body of the article and shows the results of 2010-2011 restoration work. A post 1995 timeline addition is proposed which will include conservation and/or remediation work undertaken during since that time and can elaborate on the preserved structures such as this. (Technical Historian, Pleasley Colliery) Stefanthatch (talk) 14:10, 3 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hope you don't mind update

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hope you don't mind me adding an update but it seemed a pity not to make a reference to all the restoration work that has been done recently Carllrac (talk) 15:41, 15 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Source of "Sputnik" claims?

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Just wondering if there was any citation for that? Only think I can find is http://www.pleasleypittrust.org.uk/#!services/c187h - which looks like they've just copied it verbatim.

Edent (talk) 11:36, 23 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Add topic