Talk:Please Read the Letter

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 2400:1F00:13:C828:5543:756F:BBD7:11CA in topic Month

Potential sources edit

Song infobox edit

I see no wrong in including a song infobox in the article, when the song by Page and Plant preceeded the later single by Plant and Krauss. Both are different versions, one a straight rock song and another a folk song. Also the song and the single were produced by two different teams. Since there exists other articles such as for example Gold Dust Woman, which features both song and single infoboxes, I see nothing in the infobox guidelines which precludes the usage of both. MegX (talk) 06:20, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Its here: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Songs#Infoboxes. --Efe (talk) 07:12, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
Both infoboxen are useful, i agree. But how is it decided which goes first? This article has the clearly more notable version first - is that standard? Or chronological order? Just wondering.Yobmod (talk) 08:46, 11 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
I think it would be better to discuss this at the project's talk page. --Efe (talk) 08:59, 11 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Please Read the Letter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:25, 26 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Month edit

Month 2400:1F00:13:C828:5543:756F:BBD7:11CA (talk) 16:19, 4 April 2023 (UTC)Reply