 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
Screenshot edit
WE NEED A SCREEN SHOT!--WinifredJ (talk) 21:22, 21 August 2009 (UTC)--WinifredJ (talk) 21:22, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
Rating edit
It seems that whoever made the infobox has mistaken "Rating" for "Review/Reception". The page needs an appropriate rating (e.g. "E for Everyone"), and the current comments in that section should be moved to the main article with proper citations. 74.210.86.205 (talk) 07:35, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
Moved from Pixie Hollow (Disney attraction) edit
Pixie Hollow previously redirected to the online game section in the Disney Fairies article. However, most of the articles linking to "Pixie Hollow" discuss the theme attraction rather than the online game. I fixed the links so that those article discussing the online game now have the link to Disney Fairies#Online game, while those talking about the attraction keep the "Pixie Hollow" link. --LoЯd ۞pεth 23:21, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
Stub Type? edit
This article is obviously a stub, but I could not find the correct type. Maybe it is right the way it is, or you could look over it.
TTorres896 (talk) 00:58, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Split proposal edit
The page about splitting starts out, "If an article becomes too large or a section of an article has a length that is out of proportion to the rest of the article...." Neither of those is the case here. There is no need to split this article. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 17:53, 30 June 2013 (UTC)