Talk:Pink Friday (fragrance)

This article was nominated for deletion on 22 February 2022. The result of the discussion was redirect.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pink Friday (fragrance) redirect.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands Low‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fashion Low‑importance

	Fashion portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Contested deletion edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (All information in article is referenced by verifiable and and independent, third-party sources) --1flyguyrob (talk) 16:21, 8 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Contested deletion edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (I have made changes to the page so itis verfiable and removed promotional phrasing so it is more encyclopeadic) --1flyguyrob (talk) 17:34, 8 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Add topic