Talk:Pier Gerlofs Donia/GA1

Latest comment: 17 years ago by Anas Salloum

This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of June 9, 2007, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: Not well-written: weak prose.
2. Factually accurate?: Not even close: no references, no footnotes, lots of original research.
3. Broad in coverage?: Doesn't look like it.
4. Neutral point of view?: No. Article uses an obviously biased tone.
5. Article stability? Yes.
6. Images?: OK.

When these issues are addressed, the article can be resubmitted for consideration. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a GA review. Thank you for your work so far. —Anas talk? 10:46, 9 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Checklist

edit
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    a (fair representation):   b (all significant views):  
  5. It is stable.
     
  6. It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
    a (tagged and captioned):   b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA):   c (non-free images have fair use rationales):  
  7. Overall:
    a Pass/Fail:  

Anas talk? 10:46, 9 June 2007 (UTC)Reply