Talk:Piedmont Middle School

Schools Low‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

California: San Francisco Bay Area Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	San Francisco Bay Area portal This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Thanks to Emiellaiendiay for the substantial expansion and improvement of this aricle in Feb 2007 edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

This article has been greatly expanded and improved thanks to the single handed efforts of Emiellaiendiay. It needs to be re-rated at once. Since I am a competitor in the "Jumpaclass" project, i am loath to perform the final evaluation, but Emiellaiendiay has asked me to participate in the evaluation and thus i offer the following input so that another editor can hopefully finalize the re-evaluation swiftly.

At present the article has:

Satisfactory NPOV
Satisfactory images
Satisfactory references for B class
Prose: Well written
Comprehensiveness: Generally this is OK. The article could use more information on physical plant (e.g. square footages of buildings, and major facilities architectural style discussion, elaboration on the concept of "closed"). This facilities/architecture aspect is the only area where i think B class is in any doubt, although the photos help a lot here.

In summary the article now stands at "Start" or "B" Class. If it were up to me, i would be inclined to give it the benefit of the doubt and award a "B", but desirably, someone else can finalize this review. Regards. Anlace 18:04, 27 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

ok since no one else has stepped up, i shall conclude this review, since reviews should be timely. I hereby rate this article as "B class" pursuant to above edit notes. Anlace 17:29, 5 March 2007 (UTC) agreed Victuallers (talk) 17:24, 27 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Add topic