Talk:Phil Schiller

Latest comment: 10 years ago by 81.103.166.105 in topic Controversy

Untitled edit

Mr. Schiller is a Senior VP of Apple Computer, a Fortune 500 company, and probably is a likely contender for CEO if/when Jobs retires. He routinely generates press, a google seach yeilds a half million results. The first 10 at least seem to directly apply to him. In his duties at Apple, he's in charge of marketing for a company that is widely known for its innovative advertising and marketing programs. I think he meets the basic criteria for notability. --Xyrrus 20:38, 9 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

I removed the notability tag. The previous article was removed after I tagged it as a copyright violation, because the article was a direct copy of the biography on Apple.com. There were no issues notability then, so I think it's safe to assume that there aren't any issues with Schiller now. As you say, he's a likely candidate to followup Jobs. menscht 21:51, 9 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Schiller Mania edit

I removed the edit that removed the link to http://www.schiller-mania.com with the comment Removed "http://www.schiller-mania.com" link, as it was flagged as containing malicious content.

I could not find any malicious content on that site. If you think there is, please discuss here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jav72 (talkcontribs) 01:45, 15 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

DRM-Free Legacy edit

His contribution to a new social music evolution needs to be expanded as2 Changes Coming to the iTunes Store 2009 (K&M Bar (talk) 14:30, 28 October 2009 (UTC))Reply

Requested move edit

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was move per request.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 15:23, 30 September 2012 (UTC)Reply


Philip W. SchillerPhil Schiller[1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 04:03, 23 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Controversy edit

The Controversy section is incredibly biased and unsourced. It looks like someone with a grudge against Phil Schiller wrote it.

I really don't know how to use Wikipedia so can someone please change it 81.103.166.105 (talk) 13:02, 11 April 2014 (UTC)Reply