Talk:Phantom (musical)

Redirect

I redirected Phantom (1991 musical) to here because they were the same article (but this one was wikified) and then I did a lot of editing, changing and cleanup on this article. However, I left the cleanup tag because it could still use some work, especially with categorization and being more wikified. --Fotinakis^(talk) 04:23, 27 September 2005 (UTC)

If you need help with a musicals article, leave a message at the talk page for WP:MUSICALS. Also, if you see an article about a musical that does not have the musicals project tag on it, please let me know and I will add it. That will alert other editors that there is an article that needs attention. Best regards, -- Ssilvers (talk) 03:01, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Removing that tag that I've once removed is because I don't think it is needed. Since Sakurano is debuted as top star (Grand Theater) is THAT musical production, why do I need a citation? Cougarwalk (talk) 04:17, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Facts need to be cited with reliable sources. Also read WP:V. It is vandalism to remove a fact tag from an assertion on Wikipedia unless you first add a citation. -- Ssilvers (talk) 05:04, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Synopsis & Copyright Violation

The synopsis added on 2/17/08 is a direct cut-and-paste from [[1]]. According to the note on that site, the synopsis is from the liner notes on the CD. All of which means to me that it is a copyright violation; I reverted to the prior plot. (See WP:COPYVIO for reference and further reading.) JeanColumbia (talk) 23:48, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Good catch. Can you use the copyrighted text to help expand the current synopsis and break it up into acts? Best regards, -- Ssilvers (talk) 05:59, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Phantom musical.jpg

Image:Phantom musical.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 16:23, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Copyright violation: synopsis

Again, the same copy vio has occurred as on 2/17/08, so I repeat: The synopsis added on 2/22/09 is a direct cut-and-paste from [[2]]. According to the note on that site, the synopsis is from the liner notes on the CD. All of which means to me that it is a copyright violation; I reverted, once again, to the prior plot. (See WP:COPYVIO for reference and further reading.) JeanColumbia (talk) 23:36, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

I note that the same editor who added the copyvio also added the Hale Centre Theatre Production in 2009. I doubt that is notable, as it is a community theatre and thus falls under the general prohibition of including amateur productions per WP:WPMT guidelines. JeanColumbia (talk) 23:49, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Title deletion

The "American Musical Sensation" as part of the title needs to be removed. According to the official press release, libretto and reports, the real title is just "Phantom" not "Phantom American Musical Sensation". The American Musical Sensation is the advertising slogan for the show i think. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.228.112.4 (talk) 18:23, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Hi. Can you give us a link to on official press release from the producers that clarifies this? The posters, the album, etc. always include the words "The American Musical Sensation". See: http://www.amazon.com/Phantom-American-Musical-Sensation-Studio/dp/B000003FGT -- Ssilvers (talk) 23:22, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

I have not found any sources where Kopit or Yeston refer to the title as "Phantom: The American Musical Sensation". They have only called it Phantom. Here is an interview of Kopit saying the title is "Phantom" not "Phantom: The American Musical Sensation":

We changed the title to Phantom because we didn't want to seem opportunistic. Webber's show is a great spectacle. Ours is more about the characters.[3]

Also, I have seen several posters, playbill, and reports where they do not include the words "American Musical Sensation". Example, Candlelight Dinner Playhouse omitted the term American and called it "Yeston & Kopit's Phantom: Musical Sensation" or "Phantom: Musical Sensation" ([4]) Several other theaters used just "Phantom", examples such as Porchlight Theatre [5], North Carolina Theatre [6], Shire Music Theatre[7],Gateway Playhouse[8], Myers Dinner Theatre[9], New York Times review[10]

The original theater company, Theater Under the Stars reported the title was "Phantom of the Opera" but as Kopit and wikipedia's citation said, the play was renamed to "Phantom". TUTS has since kept the "Phantom" title.[11] The title of just "Phantom" is also consistent with the official libretto published by Samuel French, Inc in 1992. (see [12]) In it, the publisher noted that the billing and credit requirements title the play as only "Phantom"(see: [13])

All other informal variations of the title with the the addition of subtitles,slogans,etc came later. The RCA recording was later released in 1993 (with the cover "American Musical Sensation"). It seems to me the "American Musical Sensation" is the advertising slogan, as one review states [14] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.228.112.4 (talk) 18:52, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

I went ahead and made the change, although, frankly, I am not fully convinced. In the Kopit interview above, Kopit is saying that they changed the title from "Phantom of the Opera" to "Phantom" so as to avoid confusion with the Lloyd Webber musical, and he does not address the subtitle "The American Sensation". None of the other sources you give seem specifically to say that the official name does not include the subtitle. The fact that the subtitle was used on the album is a pretty powerful indication that it's part of the name. Still, it's not used in a lot of places, so I think it is fair to leave the subtitle off unless we see more evidence to the contrary. BTW, please see WP:WHY, which explains the benefits of establishing your own username. All the best, -- Ssilvers (talk) 00:23, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

In several interviews, Kopit and Yeston both confirm the title has been changed from Phantom of the Opera to Phantom. They never say it was changed from Phantom of the Opera to Phantom: The American Musical Sensation because the change was to Phantom (no subtitle), so you won't be able to find any sources where Kopit & Yeston say the title was Phantom: The American Musical Sensation. About their play, Kopit and Yeston have both described it as a "traditional American musical" or a "good old fashioned American musical" but they still named it Phantom. Most sources have the name under Phantom and make no mention of a subtitle. Professional critics in their reviews will clarify the one-named title Phantom by writing phrases like "simply called, Phantom" or "titled, Phantom" or "just Phantom". Theatre guide directories and encyclopedias (like the Cambridge Guide to American Theatre, Oxford Companion to American Theatre) also have the musical listed under the name Phantom. Phantom- without the subtitle- also appears on official press releases in theatres (http://www.wjfw.com/event.html?SKU=20100222184853, http://www.lacomedia.com/phantompress.pdf, http://chicago.broadwayworld.com/article/Stage_Door_Chicago_Phantom_20071020, http://www.thefulton.org/phantom/), programs (http://www.porchlighttheatre.com/phantom-program.pdf, http://www.pioneertheatre.org/press-room/season-archives/2001-2002-season/phantom/), as well as on tickets sold for the show. The article looks fine now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.30.43.183 (talk) 03:18, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

File:Phantom musical.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Phantom musical.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 December 2011 What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 11:02, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Phantom (musical). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090601223127/http://www.musicaltheatresw.com:80/page10.html to http://www.musicaltheatresw.com/page10.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:34, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Phantom (musical). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121016101418/http://www.playbill.com/news/article/52905-Yestons-Phantom-w-Original-Star-White-Haunts-San-Jose-May-20 to http://www.playbill.com/news/article/52905-Yestons-Phantom-w-Original-Star-White-Haunts-San-Jose-May-20
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071121193610/http://www.broadwaytheatre.com/show_pgs/phantom.htm to http://www.broadwaytheatre.com/show_pgs/phantom.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091012162237/http://altonacitytheatre.com.au/pastshows.asp?showid=77 to http://www.altonacitytheatre.com.au/pastshows.asp?showid=77
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160309193700/http://www.sponichi.co.jp/osaka/ente/takarazuka/backnumber/040515/takarazuka.html to http://www.sponichi.co.jp/osaka/ente/takarazuka/backnumber/040515/takarazuka.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160309192903/http://www.sponichi.co.jp/osaka/ente/takarazuka/backnumber/060624/takarazuka.html to http://www.sponichi.co.jp/osaka/ente/takarazuka/backnumber/060624/takarazuka.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:33, 2 January 2018 (UTC)