This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Civil engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Civil engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Civil engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Civil engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Civil engineeringCE articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TransportWikipedia:WikiProject TransportTemplate:WikiProject TransportTransport articles
This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked
Coverage and accuracy: not checked
Structure: not checked
Grammar and style: not checked
Supporting materials: not checked
An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.
Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Why is this assessed as "mid" importance across the board? It would seem highly unlikely for something to be assessed the same importance across so many subjects. -- 65.92.181.190 (talk) 04:12, 22 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
Agreed. And it is not even related to some of the WikiProjects it is currently listed in. I'm removing WikiProject Spaceflight. Cheers. N2e (talk) 21:08, 18 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 11 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
The second ref (Doerffer et al) seems to be a broken link: I get no response. The third (Melber-Wilkending et al) is very slow to load and in any case is incomplete. Are there any analyses post Eden et al (ie post 2006) to confirm their view that gaps, rather than 2D peniches are best?TSRL (talk) 08:13, 25 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
I don't have any trouble with the Doerffer link, but maybe it's protected? I haven't seen anything else re: gaps versus peniches. Thanks for the attention to the article. Dohn joe (talk) 18:11, 25 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
Hm. I can get both the abstract and the full text through that link. Let me see if I can find another way to the paper. Dohn joe (talk) 19:45, 25 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
.jpg){kind=small}
