Talk:Peinado

Peinado has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: September 2, 2023. (Reviewed version).

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Argentina Low‑importance

	Argentina portal This article is part of WikiProject Argentina, an attempt to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to Argentina. If you would like to participate, you can improve Peinado, or sign up and contribute to a wider array of articles like those on our to do list.ArgentinaWikipedia:WikiProject ArgentinaTemplate:WikiProject ArgentinaArgentine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Volcanoes Low‑importance

	Volcanoes portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mountains Low‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Geography Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Geography To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations
Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles.
Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention
Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions
Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country
Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes
Map : See Wikipedia requested maps
Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability
Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places
Stubs : See Geography stubs

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

Google Scholar

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in Argentina may be able to help!

The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Unreadable source edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This may be a reference to archaeological sites on the volcano, but it's not readable. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 16:50, 14 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

GA Review edit

Latest comment: 8 months ago5 comments3 people in discussion

Passed. DimensionalFusion (talk) 18:37, 2 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Peinado/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: DimensionalFusion (talk · contribs) 09:53, 26 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

At a cursory glance, it doesn't have any reason to quick-fail. Looks like an interesting article.

It is reasonably well written.
a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):

Prose is broadly understandable to a broad audience.

b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

Article comlies with MoS in lead section, layout, WtW, lists, and fiction
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a. (reference section):

All citations are verifiable

b. (citations to reliable sources):

Inline citations back up their corresponding claims

c. (OR):

Article does not contain any original research

d. (copyvio and plagiarism):

Article does not contain any copyright violations
It is broad in its coverage.
a. (major aspects):

The article addresses the main aspects of the geological formation

b. (focused):

Article stays focused on the topic in an appropriate level of detail

[OLD]: The article sometimes strays into unnecessary detail, such as in the geology where is lists other volcanoes in the region for some reason
My thinking is that listing some neighbouring volcanoes is pertinent information, as context. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 18:20, 26 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:

No undue weight is given to any particular opinions
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:

No edit warring as far as I can see
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):

Article image is tagged with its copyright status

There is only 1 photo (a sattelite) in the whole article
Unfortunately, there aren't that many photos of this remote area.

b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Media used has relevance to the topic
Overall:
Pass/fail:

While the article mostly meets the criteria, some areas require improvement before it metts good article critera

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

Status query edit

DimensionalFusion, Jo-Jo Eumerus, where does this review stand? I see that both the start of the review and a response were posted on the same day over two months ago, and since then, nothing. Is there a way to get this moving, and hopefully on its way to completion? Thanks to you both. BlueMoonset (talk) 22:38, 1 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I honestly completely forgot about the review as I was otherwise occupied. I’ll get back to reviewing this tomorrow DimensionalFusion (talk) 02:20, 2 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add topic