Talk:PeaceMaker

copyvio

this page was essentially an unaltered copy of the game website, [1], so i deleted it and replaced it with a stub. It needs some work . . . --heah 02:05, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

How is this "article" anything but a free advertisement for this game?

In reality, how is any article little but an advertisement for what is being described? Be it a game, a car, or a religion. Mushrom 17:29, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

External links

What do you think about removing the next two links from the article?

• Thomas Barnett blog on PeaceMaker - Also it has PeaceMaker in the title, the article talk about something else.
• Game Developers Conference 2005 - does not hold any valuable information

Mark Matusevich (talk) 17:41, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Simulator?

Is the statement that the game simulates the conflict appropriate? At best, the game simulates political views on the conflict of its creators and sponsors. Saying that it "simulates", creates an impression that the consequences of your decisions in the game will be some how close to their consequences in the real world. Or at least, they will be close to what scientific consensus says it will be. But as the conflict is a political issue, there is no any consensus. Mark Matusevich (talk) 18:26, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Educational video games category

The game should not be in "educational video games" category. Propaganda is not an education after all! What do you think? Mark Matusevich (talk) 18:26, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Well, it teaches people about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and it has no bias. Israel may be able to attack Palestine, but in the real world as well, Palestine is weaker. 62.31.242.55 (talk) 15:45, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

It is clear about its political position, and is educational in teaching the different challenges confronting Israeli and Palestinian leaders. Tedperl (talk) 18:22, 29 May 2015 (UTC)