Talk:Paul Romer

Naked self-promotion article

This article is about as close to a snake oil consultant's marketing brochure as I've seen in Wikipedia. If Prof. Romer wants to be taken seriously as a scholar, he needs to jettison the "thinks his ideas are so important that he quit his academic day job" fluff. Turns out he's going / has gone back to full-time academic work in 2011. If Prof. Romer is Nobel material, this article is an «epic» fail. Dstlascaux (talk) 03:24, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Candidate for the Nobel Prize

I don't think this entry should state that he's considered a candidate for the Nobel Prize. We are not dealing here with hypothetical futures. Let's stick to what has already transpired. Tkeu 11:01, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

• • • Addition proposal: his work on 'Charter Cities' ***

Paul Romer has exposed a new idea through Ted Talks, perhaps someone would like to add this to this page. The idea is basically about building new cities with new rules (Mr. Romer calls them 'Charter Cities') which I find extremely important to mention in this page since this will occupy an important part of Mr. Romer's agenda.

If you wish to watch the video where he exposes his new and brilliant idea, visit http://www.ted.com/talks/paul_romer.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.178.52.223 (talk) 03:18, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Paul Romer's work is careless (which, of course, is no obstacle to winning prizes in economics). See, for example, M. Park, Homogenity Masquerading as Variety: The Case of Horizontal Innovation Models", Cambridge Journal of Economics and Ian Steedman "On 'Measuring' Knowledge in New (Endogenous) Growth Theory", in Old and New Growth Theories: An Assessment. 209.217.195.121 (talk) 15:19, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

And yet he's now chief economist at the World Bank, while you're an anonymous IP on Wikipedia.AllGloryToTheHypnotoad (talk) 21:18, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Relevant: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/paul-romer-nobel-new-york-university-229233 I guess we'll find out next week! AllGloryToTheHypnotoad (talk) 14:35, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Paul Romer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050908114633/http://www.reason.com/0112/fe.rb.post.shtml to http://www.reason.com/0112/fe.rb.post.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:15, 17 September 2017 (UTC)