Talk:Paul Dayton Bailey

Latest comment: 9 months ago by BobWeenig in topic Biography and Notoriety

POV edit

I think based on the number of books and publications, that this author deserves a biography, and seems to meet the criteria necessary for noteriety classification. I agree that it relies on a single souce, but that appears to be an autobiography and thus should be accurate. Bobweenig — Preceding undated comment added 19:05, 3 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

It should be pointed out that this version of this article relies much too heavily on a single source written by the subject. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thmazing (talkcontribs)

I agree, and have placed a POV tag on the article. It sounds like it was written as a family history, or copied from a family history. Definitely needs some cleaning up. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 02:40, 28 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Biography and Notoriety edit

I think based on the number of books and publications, that this author deserves a biography, and seems to meet the criteria necessary for noteriety classification. I agree that it relies on a single souce, but that appears to be an autobiography and thus should be accurate. Hot Dog (talk) 19:13, 3 August 2023 (UTC)Reply