Talk:Patricia Hepinstall and Ruth Kelley

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Antarctica, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Antarctica on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AntarcticaWikipedia:WikiProject AntarcticaTemplate:WikiProject AntarcticaAntarctica articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Red: Polar women (2016)

This article was created or improved during the Polar women edit-a-thon hosted by the Women in Red project in August 2016. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles

Merge? edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

@Ipigott: I love this article! Would it work well to merge it into the main Women_in_Antarctica article? T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)^talk 10:59, 20 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

@Evolution and evolvability: That's certainly a possibility but soon we intend to launch a WiR editathon on "Women in Aviation". I think there may well be a number of similar articles at that time. For the time being, I've included it under "See also" in Women in Antarctica but perhaps it would also be useful to include a short summary somewhere in the article. However, if you are strongly in favour of a merge, I really have no objection.--Ipigott (talk) 11:08, 20 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

@Ipigott: Ah, of course! I'd forgotten about the upcoming Women in Aviation editathon. It makes sense to keep separate in that case, and just add a summary section in the Women_in_Antarctica article. T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)^talk 23:48, 20 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 21 February 2023 edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago5 comments5 people in discussion

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Silikonz💬 04:39, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

First women to fly to Antarctica → Patricia Hepinstall and Ruth Kelley – Unorthodox title. Makes notability seem questionable. Super Ψ Dro 14:53, 21 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Support per nom. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:14, 22 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Support per nom, but does this need to be an article in the first place? This article could be merged into one of the Antartica articles. --Spekkios (talk) 23:35, 22 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Support per nom and norm (wikt:norm) --- Tbf69 P • T 19:10, 26 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add topic