Talk:Patric Verrone

The deletion of everything

I have no clue why this article was almost completely wiped out. I considered just reverted it back to where it was prior to Labelwagon, but I suppose he/she deserves the benefit of at least a chance to explain... (or someone else will probably revert it all soon, anyway). Chickenmonkey (talk) 21:34, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Bias?

The "Writers' Guild of America, West" section seems pretty damn biased and cites absolutely no references to back up its bloated claims. Nicholas Ashton (talk) 23:31, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Much better. Nicholas Ashton (talk) 03:27, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Agreed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.186.80.1 (talk) 14:45, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

The section still seems very POV. While the L.A. Times deemed the strike a success for the WGA, surely there are other, reputable sources who disagree. HandsomeSam57 (talk) 20:46, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Stephen Aboutman

why does this redirect here? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.69.83.28 (talk) 01:17, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

"Stephen Aboutman" was a South Park character used to parody Mr. Verrone. If it's going to redirect here, that should probably be included in the article. HandsomeSam57 (talk) 20:46, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Can We Get a Mod In Here?

Looking at the history of this article, either Mr. Verrone, or someone impersonating Mr. Verrone, has edited this page several times in order to erase negative opinions on the strike, and replace them with positive opinions. Similarly, someone with an axe to grind against Mr. Verrone has written nothing but negative opinions on the strike, and Mr. Verrone, and placed them into the article. Maybe we can get someone to sort through the mess, try and find a neutral way of discussing Mr. Verrone and the WGA strike? ("Some say the strike was better than sex with Vikki Blows, and everyone got lots of cool stuff and free money. Others say the strike sucked worse than 'Atlas Shrugged', and accomplished a whole lotta nuthin'.".) HandsomeSam57 (talk) 21:01, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

• http://stores.ebay.com/Historical-Figurines

  Triggered by \bstores\.ebay\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 17:35, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

 Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 14:52, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Patric Verrone. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061001162409/http://www.wga.org/subpage_newsevents.aspx?id=1419 to http://www.wga.org/subpage_newsevents.aspx?id=1419
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100613095915/http://wga.org/subpage_newsevents.aspx?id=508 to http://www.wga.org/subpage_newsevents.aspx?id=508
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304191258/http://www.wga.org/content/default.aspx?id=3798 to http://www.wga.org/content/default.aspx?id=3798

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:14, 13 January 2018 (UTC)