 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Recent edits edit
I just did my best to integrate as much of the newly-added material into the page, but unfortunately, most of what I did was to just revert edits. I want to point out that, while it's acceptable to refer to material on the organization's website, it's preferable to have independent, third-party sources when possible. See WP:RS for more explanation. I also think that there needs to be some justification given if material backed up in reliable sources is removed along with their references. The recent edits actually removed most of the references. Also, there were some large chunks of (unsourced) material added that read like a promotion of the organization's mission, and didn't seem directly relevant (such as the paragraph talking about the economic importance of the region--this information seems tangential and would belong instead on pages about the region as a whole, not this organization). See WP:NPOV for information on the point of view wikipedia articles should be written in!