Talk:Paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Jfdwolff in topic Lancet Neurol
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article was the subject of an educational assignment in 2013 Q3. Further details were available on the "Education Program:Georgia Institute of Technology/Introduction to Neuroscience (Fall 2013)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki. |
|
/Georgia Institute of Technology Introduction to Neuroscience |
reliance on primary sources
editHi - please read WP:MEDRS. This article has a lot of sourcing problems. I'm sorry if your instructor didn't go over our medical sourcing standards, but Wikipedia doesn't allow the use of primary sources etc in articles about medicine. I'm going to drop some cleanup tags on the page until the sourcing problems are addressed. Thanks, Kevin Gorman (talk) 00:33, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- I agree that encyclopedia articles cannot be based on primary sources. Please replace as many references as possible with either reviews or textbook content. Content that cannot be reliably sourced to either of these sources should be considered for removal from the article. JFW | T@lk 14:29, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
- I appreciate the feedback. For this specific topic, review articles are scarce. I have one review article, Perkes, et al., where much of the information in this article was found or supported. I do understand, though, that primary sources are not reliable for this type of article. I am working on finding additional secondary sources to replace unsupported information. Thanks. Kallen35 (talk) 23:00, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
Lancet Neurol
editPost TBI doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30259-4 JFW | T@lk 09:48, 9 August 2017 (UTC)