Talk:Parliament Hill School

Untitled

Much of the original text of this article was lifted from a 2004 inspection report that can be found here. I removed the Strengths and Weaknesses section that had been in the Wikipedia article as it was very subjective, although the statements it contained were from the report. PKT 19:06, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

I don't see it as "The" Parliament Hill School but "Parliament Hill School" I think it is generally used in this way without the definite article. However, I am a complete novice here and it isn't really that important anyway. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.21.103.171 (talk) 19:28, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

This page has been massively vandalized by several individuals. Please someone restore the original article. Retinoblastoma (talk) 18:52, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Is this an advertisement?

I got to this page from both Katherine Kartlidge and baroness young of hornsey's pages and was expecting some information about this rather famous school that has very many notable ex-students. I am shocked to see that there is absolutely no content about the school itself, just a load of rather feeble statements that presumably come from its marketing department in the hope of enticing new parents to send their kiddies. Of course there is a place for its modern role, although the 'upspeak' isn't really very encyclopedic, but what about its buildings, its founding, its changes through time, its status as a girls school and attempts at gender integration. I came away knowing nothing about this school, other than it is overly concerned with statistics - a very good reason not to send children there I'd say. DavidP (talk) 11:36, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

This is a very bad article. Every school has a history and a character, I hope this one is not all hype now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.10.201.221 (talk) 10:21, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Parliament Hill School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090212045806/http://www.bbc.co.uk/pressoffice/biographies/biogs/news/lauratrevelyan.shtml to http://www.bbc.co.uk/pressoffice/biographies/biogs/news/lauratrevelyan.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:54, 20 July 2016 (UTC)