Talk:Parish constable

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Parish constable. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070927092346/http://www.essex.police.uk/offbeat/o_mu_25.php to http://www.essex.police.uk/offbeat/o_mu_25.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:00, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

"Cities other than London"

Two recent edits attempted to improve the third paragraph of the introduction. I've reverted both of them because they each destroyed the sense of the phrase (that is, got it wrong.)

The original objection was (firstly) to the use of the name "London" to refer to the city of London (as compared to Greater London). I don't see that as an important distinction when talking about Parish constables in the 17th century, and anybody could have followed the link for disambiguation, but I would have left the change if the change hadn't broken the facts.

The second part of the objection was that it linked to a "City of London Police" article, when the City of London Police force isn't directly relevant. I made that link because the history section in that article is directly relevant, and contains the information required at that point. Again, I would have left the change if it was an improvement, but it wasn't.

The second edit attempted to repair the damage done by the first edit. Again, well meaning, but lost the information required at that point referring to English cities in general.

Both of you are welcome to try again: if you modify the paragraph again, it should retain the information that cities, other than the City of London, were reformed with metropolitan police forces, and a link to the information regarding the different situation in the City of London — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.224.212.199 (talk) 01:44, 10 June 2019 (UTC)