Fair use rationale for Image:Friuli-Venezia Giulia-Stemma.png edit

 

Image:Friuli-Venezia Giulia-Stemma.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:37, 19 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Implied claim to originality of Palmanova star plan is misleading edit

In the article it is stated that the star fortress plan of Palmanova was "revolutionary" and "much imitated," leaving the reader with the impression that Palmanova, founded in 1593, was the first city with such a plan. However the town of Karlovac in Croatia, founded in 1579, was also based on the Renaissance ideal shape of a six-pointed star. This is mentioned in the English Wikipedia article on Karlovac, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karlovac, although the star plan itself appears only on the Croatian page, http://hr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karlovac. Note that the town map there, on which this plan appears, is dated 1774, but this is only the date of the map. Karlovac was founded as a star in 1579, and as far as I know, no one claims it was the first of its kind either.

It is possible that Palmanova did serve as a model for later city-fortresses, however statements to that effect should be put in proper context. There is an association of star-cities to which both Palmanova and Karlovac belong, perhaps they should be consulted in a rewrite.

Nimdaz (talk) 08:17, 6 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

section History and Giulio Savorgnan edit

Giulio Savorgnan was the superintendant of fotresses of the Venetian Republic and was charged with the design of the new fortress of Palma (to become the new Pama or Palmanova). The History section says that the "superintendant" founded a revolutionary new kind of settlement: Palmanova, but the name of Savorgnan is not mentioned. He has to be considered as the main designer architect and superintendant builder of Palmanova. He proposed an 11 pointed star shape, but for economic reason the approved bastions were only 9. His help was Marc'Antonio Martinengo di Villachiara who took care of the covert road, the glacis and the counterscarp.

Apparently Vincenzo Scamozzi (architect but not a military engineer) had nothing to do with the design of the citadel.

At the time of the founding of Palmanova in 1593 Giulio Savorgnan (born in 1510) was 83 years old and had gained experience in Crete and Cyprus. In the latter island he had built the new citadel of Nicosia as an 11 points star, between 1567 and 1570. So I agree that Palmanova was not revolutionary, nevertheless if was well known in Europe while Nicosia was conquered by the Turks in 1570 and lost until recent years.
Nicosia was most probably the first star fort of history, preceding Karlovac in Croatia (1579). Nowadays the old town of Nicosia is still enclosed in walls and has a star shape.


--Aga 20:03, 25 April 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aga Khan (IT) (talkcontribs)

Merge Palmanova Fortress. edit

The whole city appears to be the fortress so both articles are about the same thing. Merge what little that is new on the Palmanova Fortress article into this article. noq (talk) 14:10, 1 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Palmanova. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:50, 8 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:07, 10 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:22, 4 September 2019 (UTC)Reply