Talk:Palm m100 series
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Palm m100 series article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
m130 Picture edit
It would be nice if the m130 picture did not have the screen blurred out. I can't see any reason why it has been blurred. Jackster (talk) 21:23, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Screens edit
"These models were intended to be "entry-level" PDAs. Their cases were built from cheaper materials, the covers of the LCD screens and the digitizers were plastic rather than glass, and the screens were smaller than the more expensive palms."
Erm. no. Ive got an m505 and its got a PLASTIC display. The Pilot and III had glass ones, dunno about the V 94.168.179.213 (talk) 15:19, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
Battery replacement edit
"users who removed all the batteries and then replaced them all would find that the backup battery had died in the time that it took to change the batteries, with the effect that the unit's memory had been erased" This is false--you could remove both batteries at a time, if you didn't take ages to add the new ones (IIRC was something like 60 seconds). If there are no objections, I will change this soon. --08:00, 10 August 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.96.174.237 (talk)
When were these produced? edit
Dates would be really helpful - when models were issued, when they were discontinued, when support ended. The article tells me what people thought of them in the day (implied by the article being written mostly in the past tense), but not whether that day was in 2013 or 1993. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.149.90.60 (talk) 13:53, 21 August 2015 (UTC)