This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
User:Razer2115 has removed sourced content from the article. I'd like to improve the wording and keep the content in the article. 217.182.79.182 (talk) 15:21, 3 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
Please see Biographies of living persons-Balance. The current tone of the article and the particular section is overly negative. Even if the content is sourced, It should be presented in balanced and neutral manner. Razer(talk) 15:37, 3 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
I for one support the removal - Although sourced it's not really appropriate here and in some respects it's not relevant either, Many people have different views about different things but that doesn't mean they need to be in an article all the time. –Davey2010Talk 15:53, 3 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
