Talk:Paddy Ashdown/Archive 1

Archive 1

Untitled

Currently (August 2005) Mr Paddy Ashdown is preparing to leave his office, due to expire of his term. He is selling his summer house in Jablanica. It is a well-known fact, widely discussed in local press. Thefore the sentence:

He took a liking to Bosnia and bought a summer house for himself near Jablanica in central Bosnia, which he intends to visit regularly when he retires.

is no more entirely true and should be removed. MarianL 08:14, 18 August 2005 (UTC)

Ah, thanks. You should make a note of such things in the edit summary, I thought this was abuse because it was an unexplained deletion. --Joy [shallot] 14:38, 18 August 2005 (UTC)

What on earth is this Bosnian politics infobox doing here?

I've heard he used to be a british liberal poticicians, has he changed his country? :O Constanz 15:20, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

OK, I see he's become a hig representative there. (Box looked rather surprising though)

What is a non-religious Roman Catholic?

I thought Roman Catholicism was a religion. Am I missing something? Bluewave 20:56, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

It probably means that his father was born into a Roman Catholic family, but stopped attending church. I've now changed it to non-practicing, which is a more usual term. David Underdown 12:36, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

It may be 'more usual', but it is also misspelled.

Dead link

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://www.libdems.org.uk/party/people/lord-ashdown-of-norton-sub-hamdon.html
  • In Paddy Ashdown on Mon Jul 17 15:05:01 2006, 404 /www.libdems.org.uk/party/people/lord-ashdown-of-norton-sub-hamdon.html
  • In Paddy Ashdown on Thu Jul 27 00:40:19 2006, 404 /www.libdems.org.uk/party/people/lord-ashdown-of-norton-sub-hamdon.html

--maru (talk) contribs 04:40, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Page structure

This page needs a major cleaup and restructuring. I will find an appropriate tag, and temporarily move the TOC to the top of the page. --anskas 22:35, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Mother

'his mother was a QA' : what is a QA in this context meant to mean? 145.253.108.22 12:27, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Queens Auxilliary nurse.Billy from Bath (talk) 12:06, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

GCMG

The titles and styles bit at the botton puts this after his name in 2001, but the article says he only got it in 2006, which is correct? PiTalk - Contribs 23:43, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Since he was lacking "PC" between 2001 & 2006 it seems most likely someone got them mixed up. (The alternative would imply he resigned from the Privy Council the very day he became a Lord but PC resignations are incredibly rare and only when someone is under a cloud.) Timrollpickering (talk) 23:54, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

The following page, on the Ministry of Justice website, seems to suggest that 'PC' and 'Right Honourable' are mutually exclusive alternatives. http://www.justice.gov.uk/guidance/foa-peers.htm#peers-pc PC is to be used for eg Dukes and Marquesses who are members of the Privy Council, because for example a Duke is 'His Grace' so will not be termed the Right Honourable and therefore without the letters 'PC' the Duke's Privy Council status would not be shown. However for Barons, eg a life Baron such as Paddy Ashdown, they should use 'Right Honourable' to show their Privy Council status and therefore the letters 'PC' are superfluous. Apparently barons who are not members of the privy council, should refrain from describing themselves as Right Honourable, to avoid confusion, even though they have traditionally been able to use this description. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.4.81.187 (talk) 18:13, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Related to Daniel O'Connell

This article states that Paddy is related to Daniel O'Connell, and quotes "The Ashdown Diaries" as a reference. The book in question, page 367 says:

over his left shoulder, in the manner of drivers the world over, 'I gather you are the great-great-grandson of Daniel O'Connell.'
I said I believed I was.

This reference fails WP:V. Are there any other references, other than a self-published source, that can verify this claim? --HighKing (talk) 10:00, 28 May 2010 (UTC)