Talk:POETICS list

Poetry Low‑importance

	Poetry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York (state): SUNY / Western NY Low‑importance

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject State University of New York (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Western New York (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I believe this article misrepresents the temporary shutdown of the Buffalo Poetics List site in 1999. The list was not simply shut down due to "overposting" by a contributor (Henry Gould - ie., myself). The list was shut down after a rancorous debate involving insults and personal attacks on the list owners and other people; there were a number of different issues and persons involved; I was not the initiator, the cause, nor the sole participant of this fracas.

In conclusion I don't think this particular statement about the history of the Poetics List represents a neutral point of view. I realize also that I'm not an objective observer myself, & my views would need further corroboration.

Hhgould (talk) 21:46, 23 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

I agree with above. In addition, I don't see why the Poetics list is notable. I recommend it be combined with other related articles instead of standing alone. All of the cited references come from the list site itself. Probably does not warrant an article by itself. Accuracy primo (talk) 19:34, 23 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Needs to be merged with University of Buffalo article edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

This article is highly biased and uses no outside references for the info. It is probably written by the list gatekeepers, who are not notable. This list is not noteworthy because it is solely exclusive to the university and those who run it and not open to the general public. In addition, the posts are edited by one person, so the discussion becomes even less relevant and noteworthy for inclusion as a separate article in an encyclopedia because it is a closed list. Really needs to be moved to U of Buffalo article. It had some distinct relevance in the past at its start, but it is currently closed, censored, and edited and rather irrelevent in today's open blog culture. PulitzerBoard (talk) 13:18, 10 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Visited site and appears to be limited to U of Buffalo only and closed. all references point back to site itself, no outside references. recommend this article info be merged with article about University at Buffalo, The State University of New York|University at Buffalo Accuracy primo (talk) 19:47, 23 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Fully agree with above, either delete article or move to University of Buffalo as a smaller section. --Bridgecross (talk) 19:29, 12 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Add topic