Talk:PC/104

Latest comment: 7 years ago by 63.200.6.92 in topic Broken history reference link

Compatibility between different PC-104 specifications edit

I see that PC/104 and PCI-104 are not compatible for obvious reasons. But can a PCI-104 board stack on a PC/104-Plus or vice versa? It would appear that a PCI-104 board should be able to stack on top of a PC/104 plus board. Can someone verify this? 24.186.141.163 (talk) 21:14, 21 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on PC/104. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:57, 11 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Broken history reference link edit

The link to the PC/104 Consortium history is Reference #4. I believe it should be: "http://pc104.org/consortium/history/" but don't know how to change it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.200.6.92 (talk) 16:26, 12 April 2017 (UTC)Reply