 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Picture needed edit
anyone got one?
Yes, have loaded two views.John Pons (talk) 08:39, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
"Reads like an Advertisment" tag edit
this was added without explanation some time ago. Article in fact contained several criticims off the aircraft (e.g. low sales), and no advertising material. To the best of my knowledge no Pacific Aerospace employee contributed to it. Added (?original research) critique that this plane is rather overpowered for usable space inside it, then deleted tag. Please before reinserting the tag, I suggest it would be prudent to;- -1 contact other editors of page -2 specify changes desired in detail, and what "reads like advertising" -3 confirm you have no relationship with a competitor or disclose it if you do and -4 best of all suggest what you think the article should look like instead of just slapping a tag on it. Winstonwolfe (talk) 08:35, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
Funny: in the main article the Vne (Never Exceed Speed) is lower than the Cruising speed...
Turboprop? edit
Sounds like a piston engine. What are we saying here? Piston or Turbo? Note: A turboprop is not a piston engine with a turbocharger. It's a turbine engine like a jet. Longinus876 (talk) 03:29, 10 October 2023 (UTC)