Talk:P. G. T. Beauregard/Archives/2017
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on P. G. T. Beauregard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120425052144/http://www.teachighistory.org/ to http://www.teachighistory.org/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:35, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
The Civil War Was All About Slavery
Just like World War II was not about Anti-Semitism, or the Iraq War being fought to 'free' the Iraqis from Saddam Hussein. Wars are usually fought for economic dominance. Just because Beauregard fought for the south, does not necessarily make him a bigot or in favor of slavery. What reasons he chose to fight for the Confederacy are not exactly clear in this article, the truth may be a little more complicated than you may understand.(TAGE)
- Your condescension is not appreciated, for reasons a little more complicated than you may understand. Also, others may oppose your opinion on their own grounds of historical knowledge. Beauregard came from a slave-owning family. His financial privilege was derived from slave ownership. Yet there is NO MENTION IN THE ARTICLE that the plantation where he lived was staffed with slaves.
- "P. G. T. Beauregard: Napoleon in Gray - Page 3 - Google Books Result
- https://books.google.com/books?isbn=0807119741
- T. Harry Williams - 1995 - History
- "Pierre Gustave Toutant-Beauregard. ... Pierre played with slave boys his own age and as a baby was suckled by a Dominican slave woman."
- --cat yronwode (not logged in) 75.101.104.17 (talk) 17:06, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Maybe someone was taught "alternate history" in whatever school they attended (historical revisionism is a thing, http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/the_south_still_lies_about_the_civil_war/), but the Mississippi Declaration of Causes makes it pretty clear. https://www.civilwar.org/learn/primary-sources/declaration-causes-seceding-states
''In the momentous step which our State has taken of dissolving its connection with the government of which we so long formed a part, it is but just that we should declare the prominent reasons which have induced our course.
Our position is thoroughly identified with the institution of slavery-- the greatest material interest of the world.''
Now, what's this silliness about it not being about slavery? Morty C-137 (talk) 18:10, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
POV
Can the people that are calling Beauregard a "bigot" and a "hippocrite" perhaps get a life (and a history lesson). This is a professional article not a blog so keep your opinions to yourself, nobody wants to hear your ranting. But you do have a right to have an opinion just try to be civil about it ok?
P.S. I'm a decendent of the so called "bigot" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.221.246.75 (talk) 01:41, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
- I read somewhere (will try to find it) that his first language was French; he didn't speak English until in his teens. Is that correct? Things were much more regional in those days...By the way, I think he is underappreciated today - best I can tell he never lost any battles...Engr105th (talk) 07:46, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
I bet his first language was probably French because his name is a French name. So that one is probably correct.(Apocalyptica1234 (talk) 23:10, 12 April 2016 (UTC))
- Best I can tell, you haven't read Battle of Shiloh. :-) Although I agree with you that he was underappreciated, he actually fought a lot fewer battles than other generals of his rank [other than Cooper]. Hal Jespersen (talk) 23:01, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- Best I can tell, you haven't read Battle of Shiloh. :-) Although I agree with you that he was underappreciated, he actually fought a lot fewer battles than other generals of his rank [other than Cooper]. Hal Jespersen (talk) 23:01, 17 January 2008 (UTC)