Talk:P-adic exponential function
Latest comment: 1 year ago by 46.123.245.39 in topic Strassman's theorem and Euler's identity
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
a^p^x edit
No, I wasn't wrong. a^p^x has no relevance to the p-adic exponential, even if the domains of "a", "p", and "x" weren't different. I was going to say that the concept of a^p^x as used here is totally different than that in double exponential function; it would be, but it isn't even used here. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 21:23, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
Strassman's theorem and Euler's identity edit
I don't understand how to apply Strassman's theorem to deduce that there is no analogue to Euler's identity. The coefficients of the exponential function don't converge to zero. Can someone expand on this? 46.123.245.39 (talk) 19:41, 11 October 2022 (UTC)