This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour articles
Ouk Chhayavy is part of WikiProject Cambodia, a project to improve all Cambodia-related articles. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systematic bias group on Wikipedia, aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Cambodia-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.CambodiaWikipedia:WikiProject CambodiaTemplate:WikiProject CambodiaCambodia articles
I'm looking for the best picture or any informations about the KAF's U-6 (Beaver). It seem that the KAF had 3 aircrafts.
But in 1971, during the viet cong's sapper attack at the Pochentong Air Base,at least 1 Beaver was destroyed.In 1972
at leat 1 Beaver was refurbished with a new engine.
http://www.khmerairforce.com/AAK-KAF/AVNK-AAK-KAF/Cambodia-Beaver-KAF.JPG
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
John B123: First of all, thank you for all your hard work reviewing new pages. It's always a pleasure to see a new article of mine has made it through your review.
As for this article, you tagged it for notability. I don't know where to properly reply to that, so I'll do it here. If it's not the proper way, please let me know. As far as I see it, the article fulfills the notability criteria for politicians (since there are no criteria for trade unionists). Ouk Chhayavy occupies the highest position in a national trade union that is by itself highly notable. The alleged attack on her has also made international news.
The article obviously still lacks sources, but I want to attribute this to systemic bias - for example, Ouk Chhayavy's union, CITA, is highly notable in Cambodian labour and politics as one of the main opposition-aligned unions - but as you can see, we don't have an article for it as of yet (though I'm working on that). I also bet there are more source in Cambodian, but sadly I don't speak that language. Cambodia as a country is also highly restrictive against trade union activity, which also means their coverage is highly restricted. For all of these reasons, I would like to remove the notability tag, if you don't object. Zarasophos (talk) 22:40, 3 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
Hi Zarasophos. As you point out, there are no WP:SNGs for trade unionists, but unfortunately WP:POLITICIAN can't be applied to them. Although most leaders of Trade Unions are notable, this is shown by WP:GNG - received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.
Doing a quick search on Google, there seems to be enough sources in English to add to the article and establish WP:GNG. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 22:59, 3 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for your quick reply. I added two more sources, the most substantive ones I could find, which I think pushes the article above WP:GNG. I've removed the notability tag for now, but feel free to add it back in if you think the sources still aren't good enough. Zarasophos (talk) 09:02, 5 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
