Talk:Ottawa Fury SC

Player Bios

Snipets to start some player bios:

Paul Kihara, currently residing in Ottawa, Ontario, is playing his second year with the Ottawa Fury PDL Team. Kihara has had a very decorated youth career, most recently being part of the U-21 Kenya National Team. He has been a member of the Carleton University Soccer team for three years, and is one of the main reasons for their unbeaten 2007 season scoring six goals in 11 games from midfield. Coppercanuck (talk) 13:23, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Ladislas Bushiri or Ladi, returns to the Fury PDL squad after a 2007 campaign in which he featured heavily, making 14 appearances with over 1000 minutes played. Bushiri was part of the 2006 St. Anthony Italia squad which literally won it all - the Ontario Cup, CSL Open Cup and the Canadian Club National Championships. He enters the 2008 PDL season already familiar with new team head coach Stephen O’Kane, having played under him in 2007 with the Algonquin Thunder. Bushiri helped the Thunder win their fourth straight Ontario CAA championship and narrowly missed out on a second straight Canadian CAA championship, losing on penalty kicks in the final. Coppercanuck (talk) 13:26, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Requested move 04 March 2014

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved. This will probably leave a fair number of incoming links to be repaired. It's hard to say how many, since many of the listings on the WHL will be from navboxen. I'll fix those, but we'll probably have to wait a while thereafter to see where there really are links that need fixing. --BDD (talk) 18:08, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Ottawa Fury → Ottawa Fury (2005–13) – Defunct USL PDL club. Folded to make way for the NASL expansion franchise with the same name. – Michael (talk) 23:34, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

• Comment: (2005-2013) would be more normal. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:18, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. – Michael (talk) 23:49, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

• @In ictu oculi: actually '2005–13' is fine - firstly you have used the incorrect dash, secondly per precedent at North American Soccer League (1968–84). GiantSnowman 10:04, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Really? it looks horrible, but so be it, then disregard. As for the dash, my keyboard has only one dash. In ictu oculi (talk) 10:12, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Well I don't like it either, not sure what policy says. Who knows, if consensus is here for '2005–2013' then we could always RM the other article on the back of it. GiantSnowman 10:16, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

From WP:DATERANGE, "the range's "end" year is usually abbreviated to two digits" EddieV2003 (talk) 20:35, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

• Oppose Perhaps you're thinking of the Whitecaps or Sounders articles where there was an original NASL article, a USL article and then MLS article. Unlike other club articles, there is no overlap between this one and previous incarnations. The NASL article is at Ottawa Fury FC. There is no need for a DAB. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:25, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

• Support a move so that the base title can be redirected to Ottawa Fury FC. Honestly, they should just be merged; readers shouldn't have to play guessing games about where they'll find the material they're looking for. However, the merge hasn't found consensus. Considering that, it's pretty clear from Google News that most references to "Ottawa Fury" now intend the existing professional team rather than its departed amateur incarnation.[1] I'd recommend Ottawa Fury (PDL) instead of the dates, as it's more WP:CONCISE and used in Orange County Blues FC (PDL), but any move will do.--Cúchullain ^t/c 18:45, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

I've just noticed Ottawa Fury Women, another existing team with this same name, and have created a disambiguation page at Ottawa Fury (disambiguation) to help readers navigate the articles. If the men's articles aren't merged, this PDL article definitely needs to be moved; it's definitely not the primary topic of the name "Ottawa Fury" over the two existing incarnations.--Cúchullain ^t/c 18:58, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

If the NASL team is known as Ottawa Fury, then yes a move in order. However, I see them referred to Ottawa Fury FC at http://www.nasl.com and http://www.nasl.com/teams. Their domain is ottawafuryfc.com. Do they have a media guide? What do they want to be known as? We won't know what the common name is until they've played for a month or two. Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:41, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

The NASL team can be (and evidently are) the primary topic of "Ottawa Fury" even if their article is located at Ottawa Fury FC. In the Google News search for "Ottawa Fury", the only references to the amateur team are as the earlier incarnation of the existing NASL team.[2] The vast majority of sources intend the NASL team (eg [3][4][5][6][7] and a few mean the women's team. [8] The erstwhile PDL incarnation are clearly not the primary topic of the name "Ottawa Fury", so their article needs to be moved away from the base name.--Cúchullain ^t/c 20:53, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Very selective as those sources also list FC. Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:05, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

You're not following. The question is what people mean when they use the name "Ottawa Fury". Most sources using "Ottawa Fury" intend the subject we cover at Ottawa Fury FC; very few intend this defunct amateur incarnation. As such Ottawa Fury FC is the primary topic of Ottawa Fury, regardless of the article title. Barack Obama is also the primary topic for Obama, so it redirects there even if the main article will never move. In the very least there's no evidence that this PDL team is the primary topic of "Ottawa Fury" compared to Ottawa Fury FC and Ottawa Fury Women; it actually seems to be the least common of the three.--Cúchullain ^t/c 21:51, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

I am following and I understand the concepts you're presenting. Do you follow me? My argument is that both variants, with and without "FC", are being used presently and so it's too soon to state that there is a primary name. Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:56, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

You're still not following. I'm making no argument about what the NASL team's article should be called. The fact is clear that when sources use the term "Ottawa Fury", they generally don't mean this defunct PDL team. As such we shouldn't be sending readers to the PDL team when they type in "Ottawa Fury".--Cúchullain ^t/c 22:05, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

You're still not following me. This team is named Ottawa Fury. The NASL Team is named Ottawa Fury FC. The fact is clear that when sources don't use the term consistently they generally don't have a clue what they're talking about and are seeking direction from a media person at the club and over time, a common name will emerge. Until then we should not do anything to this article.

To support my claim I'll look at your first link: [9] Then in the sidebar on the left-hand side we see

Intensity marks Day 1 of Ottawa Fury FC camp

Fury players making adjustments to Canada except the caption there lists Ottawa Fury FC

Da Costa secures tryout

Ottawa Fury FC hometown keeper Chad Bush feels the presuure

Ottawa Fury defence full of energy The article opens, "The Ottawa Fury FC"

Ottawa Fury loading up on keepers article opens "There’s no shortage of talent between the pipes on the Ottawa Fury FC’s training camp roster".

Ottawa Fury shows off its spiritual side Atrilc opens "As he loaded balls into a mesh bag at the end of Ottawa Fury FC practice".

RedBlacks sign French radio deal

So I'm sure that over time a common name will emerge, but that hasn't happened yet. Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:37, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Walter, you are conflating two distinct issues: WP:PRIMARYTOPIC and WP:COMMONNAME. Cuchullain's argument is that the primary topic/meaning of "Ottawa Fury" is the new NASL club. You are arguing that the common name of the NASL club is "Ottawa Fury FC". However, your argument doesn't actually refute Cuchullain's point. Lots of words are the primary topic something that has a different common name. For instance, the primary topic of USA is the country in the Americas, even though the common name for the country is the United States and the official name is United States of America. Lots of other things are also known as "USA", officially or otherwise, but more often than not when someone types USA into the search bar they are looking for the country. Hence USA redirects to United States. In this case, when people says "Ottawa Fury", the sources Cuchullain links above show that they usually mean the new NASL club, and no longer the defunct PDL club. And what their WP:OFFICIALNAME is is not relevant to titling discussions. TDL (talk) 23:11, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

No I'm not. The primary topic has not yet been established. Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:58, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

"If there is no primary topic, the term should be the title of a disambiguation page". TDL (talk) 00:07, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

I am going to hold my anger but I will quote more material from PRIMARYTOPIC:

Determining a primary topic

There are no absolute rules for determining whether a primary topic exists and what it is.

Now please stop your insidious talking down to me and read the whole guideline instead of the bits that you like. We have to weigh both current usage and long-term significance. 01:28, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

I'm confident no one intended to upset you, we're just trying to get on the same page, these are pretty basic guidelines. At this point we've provided quite a bit of evidence that the defunct PDL incarnation is not the primary topic of the term "Ottawa Fury" (and it seems to indicate that the NASL incarnation is primary). Do you have some evidence that the PDL team is the primary topic?--Cúchullain ^t/c 03:22, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

• Support, as the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC of "Ottawa Fury" is now the NASL club, though I agree that Ottawa Fury (PDL) is a more precise, recognizable, natural, concise and consistent disambiguation over a date range. This page should then either be redirected to Ottawa Fury FC or that article moved here. TDL (talk) 23:11, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

You may think you have, but you clearly have not. No redirects should happen until the season is well under way, because if a month after the season starts I have to undo all this it will be a waste of everyone's time here. If it should be redirected, it should be to the DAB. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:30, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

• Comment - The reason why there's an article titled Orange County Blues (PDL) is because they're currently playing in the PDL, but there's also team with the same name that is currently playing in the USL Pro. Just like last season with VSI Tampa Bay FC. However, unlike both those teams this team folded so moving this page to Ottawa Fury (PDL) doesn't make any sense. – Michael (talk) 07:39, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

However it's not clear if the junior teams will operate as "Ottawa Fury", "Ottawa Fury SC" or "Ottawa Fury FC" and until that is known, we're speculating about where to move what. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:20, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Michael, the issue is we've shown sources do use the form "Ottawa Fury" for the NASL team, and they do it much more frequently than they ever refer to the PDL team. In fact I couldn't find any remotely recent sources that mentioned the PDL incarnation except in relation to NASL team.[10] Even that one doesn't distinguish the two incarnations by the presence or absence of "FC". Some move is necessary, as the defunct PDL team is clearly not the primary topic for this name.--Cúchullain ^t/c 13:30, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Again sources also use "Ottawa Fury FC" and so there is no need for a move at this point. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:37, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

There is, since this isn't the primary topic of the term "Ottawa Fury".--Cúchullain ^t/c 16:47, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

I'll say this one more time. The season has not started. The media are either used to calling the team by its old name or the media person from the new club is trying to imply continuity (and rightly so) between the old club and the new one and so there will be some overlap until the season is well underway. There is no reason to move articles until the season has started. This discussion is too soon. Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:04, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Which is precisely why this page should at the very least become a disambig until there is a clearly defined primary topic for the name "Ottawa Fury". Your analysis of why people are referring to the NASL club as the "Ottawa Fury" is quite irrelevant. The fact is that they are. The only scenario under which this article should remain at this title is if you can show that for the PDL team "it is highly likely—much more likely than any other topic, and more likely than all the other topics combined—to be the topic sought when a reader searches for that term" or "if it has substantially greater enduring notability and educational value than any other topic associated with that term." Cúchullain has presented compelling evidence that the PDL team isn't the primary topic of the term "Ottawa Fury". To date, you haven't presented any evidence that it is. Do you have any? TDL (talk) 01:09, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Which is precisely why nothing should happen until we know something certain. Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:19, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Discussion

Any additional comments:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ottawa Fury (2005–13). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100105175057/http://www.uslsoccer.com/history/index_E.html to http://www.uslsoccer.com/history/index_E.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:15, 2 January 2018 (UTC)