Talk:Oscillation (mathematics)

Latest comment: 9 years ago by Fgnievinski in topic same as wave envelope?

Why is it that for 1/x the oscillation is undefined at -∞ and +∞. I would naively think it is zero.67.171.64.190 09:27, 4 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

You are correct. I noticed the same thing. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 15:28, 4 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Another notion of oscillation edit

There is also another notion -- oscillation of a function (say from a topological space to a metric space) defined by

 

(It is commonly used that the set of points of discontinuity is a   set.) Do we have this notion defined in some other article on wiki? If not, perhaps an article oscillation of a function could be started. --Kompik 10:47, 7 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

(Of course, d(A) in the above definition stands for diameter of a set A.) --Kompik 11:10, 7 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

is the convergence happened in oscillation edit

in any oscillating series convergence has happened eg: 

continuity edit

In addition to requiring zero oscillation, we need the function to be equal to the limiting value. Since oscillation is defined in terms of liminfs and limsups, apparently the value at the point is ignored. Tkuvho (talk) 07:51, 20 September 2010 (UTC)Reply


I was going to say the same thing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.18.76.220 (talk) 23:03, 23 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

An equivalent definition is missing edit

Another definition of oscillation is missing: Let f:I->R (where "I" is an interval contained in R). Then, its oscillation is: supremum(f(I))-infimum(f(I)). 46.19.85.55 (talk) 18:39, 10 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

same as wave envelope? edit

merge? Fgnievinski (talk) 00:14, 13 October 2014 (UTC)Reply